Research and Collections

Collections

Research

Department of Anthropology



Archaeology

Physical Anthropology

Cultural Anthropology

Image Galleries

Department Staff

Opportunities for Volunteers

Lectures, Classes and Outreaches

Gold Coast Anthropological Society

Florida Anthropological Society


Department of Paleontology

 

The Modified Accretion
Model of Neanderthal Evolution

These few paragraphs are a small excerpt from a forthcoming volume about Neanderthals by
Peter Ferdinando, M.A.

For an explanation of the morphological features
listed in this excerpt please visit:

What Morphological Features Make a Neanderthal?

It is apparent that the many European representatives of Homo heidelbergensis possessed features that presupposed the Neanderthals. The Hominin population of Europe was becoming increasingly Neanderthal-like during the course of the Middle Pleistocene (Arsuaga et al., 1993; Smith et al. 1989; Tattersall, 1999; Rightmire, 1998, 2001). The Accretion model of Neanderthal evolution attempts to place a loose definition on this transition. This model comprises four stages that build up to the final cranial features associated with the ‘Classic’ Neanderthals. According to Dean et al. (1998), the earliest stage contains ‘early-pre-Neanderthals’ that including Petralona and Arago. The second stage of the Accretion Model includes ‘pre-Neanderthals’ specimens such as Reilingen, Steinheim, Swanscombe and the finds from the Sima de los Huesos. This group shows the beginnings of the double-arched browridges and mid-facial prognathism. The third stage contains ‘early Neanderthals’ specimens from Ehringsdorf, Saccopastore, Krapina and some of the Shanidar specimens. This stage includes the appearance of the occipital bun. The final stage represents the ‘classical Neanderthals’ with traits such as increased mid-facial prognathism and a deepened orbital sulcus. This last group includes Feldhofer 1, Gibraltar 1 (Forbes Quarry), La Chapelle-aux-saints, La Ferrassie, Amud and the other specimens form Shanidar.

The Accretion Model assists with defining the appearance of the Neanderthal-like characters in European Hominins. This model is a basis for assessing an evolving lineage leading from one discrete species to another (Ferdinando and Lynn, 2004). Even with four distinct stages, it would appear to me quite easy to retain a simple two species assignment within this model. The majority of the specimens assigned to the two earliest stages are clearly representatives of the previously described G. Phillip Rightmire’s characterization of Homo heidelbergensis. Specimens allocated to the latter two stages are members of Homo neanderthalensis. This assessment is tenable even if the members of stage three do not posses every single feature seen in the ‘Classic’ Neanderthals.

I would like to suggest a few minor changes to this model (Ferdinando 2004). First, the distinction between stage 1 and 2 could be utilized to define Homo heidelbergensis specimens that do not possess and do present the Neanderthal morphology, respectively. An informal distinction between stage 2 and 3 can be to review the proportion of Neanderthal vs. non-Neanderthal features present. If the number of Neanderthal traits is over 50% this specimen probably belongs in stage 3. Finally, I assert the need for another stage in this model that of stage 5 ‘progressive’ Neanderthals. Reduction of certain Neanderthal traits in Saint-Cesaire and Vindija could represent a new direction for Neanderthal evolution, or gene flow with incoming moderns (Malez et al., 1980; Smith et al., 1985; Frayer et al., 1993). The elements that are affected include reduced and modern-like separated browridges, smaller nasal openings, slight development of chins, shortened retromolar spaces and a more anterior placement of the mental foramen.

Stage
Species
Examples
Traits
1
H. heidelbergensis Atapuerca 4, Mauer No Neanderthal Traits
2
H. heidelbergensis Arago, Petralona, Steinheim, Swanscombe,
Atapuerca 5, Reilingen
Can possess many Neanderthal traits, but not the complete suite
3
H. neanderthalensis Saccopastore, Biache-Saint Vaast, Krapina, Shanidar (early) Should display a large range of Neanderthal traits
4
H. neanderthalensis Feldhofer, La Chapelle, Gibraltar, Shanidar (late), Amud Have the characteristic ‘Classic’ morphology
5
H. neanderthalensis Saint-Cesaire, Vindija Some feature may be ‘progressive’ towards a modern morphology

This list is an adaptation of the four stage Accretion Model from Dean et al. (1998).

The assignment of these specimens to ‘stages’ is not meant to convey chronological information. There is considerable temporal overlap between the various stages. The stages are of importance to track the representation of Neanderthal features (which does have a quasi-temporal flow).

Works Cited

Arguaga, Juan-Luis., Martinez, Ignacio., Gracia, Ana., Carretero, Jose-Miguel. and Carbonell, Eudald. (1993). Three New Human Skulls from the Sima de los Huesos Middle Pleistocene Site in Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain. From Nature. V362: 534-537.

Dean, David., Hublin, Jean-Jacques., Holloway, Ralph. and Ziegler, Reinhard. (1998). On the Phylogenetic Position of the Pre-Neanderthal Specimen from Reilingen, Germany. From Journal of Human Evolution. 34: 485-508.

Ferdinando, Peter, and Lynn, Misti. (2004). Evolution in a Hominin Lineage: The Appearance of the “Classic” Neanderthal Morphology (abstract). From Journal of Morphology. V260(3): 290.

Ferdinando, Peter. (2004). Evolution in a Hominin Lineage: The Appearance of the “Classic” Neanderthal Morphology (presentation). At the 7th International Congress of Vertebrate Morphology, 27 July-1 August..

Frayer, David W., Wolpoff, Milford H., Thorne, Alan G., Smith, Fred H. and Pope, Geoffrey G. (1993). Theories of Modern Human Origins: The Paleontological Test. From American Anthropologist. 95: 14-50.

Malez, Mirko., Smith Fred H., Radovcic, Jakov. and Rukavina, Darko. (1980). Upper Pleistocene Hominids From Vindija, Croatia, Yugoslavia. From Current Anthropology. V21(3): 365-367.

Rightmire, G. Philip. (1998). Human Evolution in the Middle Pleistocene: The Role of Homo heidelbergensis. From Evolutionary Anthropology. 6: 218-227.

Rightmire, G. Philip. (2001). Patterns of Hominid Evolution and Dispersal in the Middle Pleistocene. From Quaternary International. 75: 77-84

Smith, Fred H., Boyd, Donna C. and Malez Mirko. (1985). Additional Upper Pleistocene Human Remains from Vindija Cave, Croatia, Yugoslavia. From American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 68: 375-383.

Smith, Fred H., Falsetti, Anthony B. and Donnelly, Steven M. (1989). Modern Human Origins. From Yearbook of Physical Anthropology. 32:35-68.

Tattersall, Ian. (1999). The Last Neanderthal. A Peter N. Nevraumont Book, Westview Press, A member of the Perseus Books Group: New York.

 

 

 
 
Email the Webmaster
© 2007 The Palm Beach Museum of Natural History, Inc.